Legal Opinion

Stratford, Inc. v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1916No. 13606PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered May 19, 1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action by a lessee to recover a deposit paid the lessor to be applied as rent upon premises leased for saloon purposes, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Holcomb, J. —

The one question for consideration on this appeal is whether the enactment by the people at the general election in 1914 of Initiative Measure No. 3, taking effect January 1, 1916 (Laws 1915, p. 2, § 1 et seq.; Rem. Code, § 6262-1 et seq.), rendered a certain lease for saloon purposes void. The lower court held it did.

The lease in question was originally executed on July 1, 1912, by appellant Sweeney to the firm of Deatkin & Goldie, for the premises at 910 Second avenue, in Seattle, for a term of four years, seven months and twenty-six days, with certain stipulated rentals and a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Taylor v. FinniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Gaston v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Houston Ice & Brewing Co. v. KeenanTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Greil Bros. v. MabsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Heart v. East Tennessee Brewing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1908

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fischler v. NicklinWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Doherty v. Monroe Eckstein Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Wood v. BartolinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Industrial Development & Land Co. v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Kaiser v. ZeiglerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API