Legal Opinion
Lloyd v. Murphy
California Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1944No. L. A. 18738PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
August 4, 1941, plaintiffs leased to defendant for a five-year term beginning September 15, 1941, certain premises located at the corner of Almont Drive and Wilshire Boulevard in the city of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles County, “for the sole purpose of conducting thereon the business of displaying and selling new automobiles (including the servicing and repairing thereof and of selling the petroleum products of a major oil company) and for no other purpose whatsoever without the written consent of the lessor” except “to make an occasional sale of a used automobile.” Defendant agreed not to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. American Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Seaboard Lumber Company and Capital Development Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.