Legal Opinion
Losson v. Blodgett
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1934No. Civ. 8223PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (W. J.), J., pro tem.
Plaintiff obtained judgment in the trial court for the amount of certain installments claimed to be due under the terms of an instrument which he alleges to be a lease and which defendants allege to be an agreement for the purchase and sale of real estate. The land involved is situated in the republic of Mexico. The two defendants Louis M. Blodgett and N. A. Blodgett are husband and wife, and the judgment appealed from is against both of them. The instrument which is the basis of the action was- signed by Mrs. Blodgett only, and the husband Louis M. Blodgett insists…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Levin v. SaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Williams v. NicholSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Redwood Investment Co. v. ExleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Industrial Development & Land Co. v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Edna Jackson v. Syd Grant, Belle G. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Long v. Mishicot Modern Dairy, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Los Angeles & Salt Lake R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Frey v. CorbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.