Legal Opinion

Gleason v. McPherson

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1917No. L. A. No. 3792PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants rendered upon the granting of the defendants’ motion for nonsuit.

The action was to recover damages alleged to have been caused by false representations made by the defendants to the plaintiffs.

The complaint alleges, in substance, that the plaintiffs bought of one C. J. Proud and the defendant, H. A. Land wehr, certain bonds of the Bisbee Light & Power Company, of the par value of thirty thousand dollars, and paid for the same by conveying to said Proud a certain lot in Los Angeles and to Landwehr certain other property, all of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee v. McClellandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Rendell v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Choate v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Craig v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Gleason v. ProudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harazim v. LynamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Willson v. Municipal Bond Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Bullard v. Citizens' Nat. BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Pacesetter Homes, Inc. v. BrodkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Williams v. LowenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API