Choate v. Hyde
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Shirley C. Ward, Eugene Daney, and S. M. Parsons, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This was an action to recover eighteen hundred and seventy-five dollars, the price of certain nursery trees, under a written contract between the parties, and also for four hundred and thirty-nine dollars as the increased value of the trees after demand upon defendant therefor. Defendant asked for a reformation of the contract, and for a rescission of it as revised. The court gave him judgment as prayed for, and from the order denying him a new trial plaintiff appeals.
The contract between the parties was as follows: “That said Choate agrees to have assigned a certain contract for the purchase…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nounnan v. Sutter County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rheingans v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Hargrove v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Wolfe v. SevernsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Blake v. ArpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Williams v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.