Rendell v. Scott
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. The action was brought to recover an installment of the purchase price of certain land sold by the plaintiff to the defendants. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The defendants by their cross-complaint sought to have set aside as obtained by fraud a contract by which the defendants had agreed to purchase a tract of land from plaintiff. The alleged fraud consisted of certain representations by which the defendants were induced to • enter into the contract for the purchase of the land. The cross-complaint was demurred to, and the demurrer was sustained.
It is apparent to us that the matters alleged as constituting the fraud were matters of opinion rather than of facts. It was certainly matter of opinion when the plaintiff stated that the land…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Cooper v. JevneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Schonfeld v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Nounnan v. Sutter County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Stuck v. Delta Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.