Legal Opinion
Craig v. Wade
California Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1911No. L.A. No. 2551PublishedCited by 7 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Appellant’s action is founded on section 316 of the Civil Code of California, which provides as follows :—i
“Any officer of a corporation who willfully gives a certificate, or willfully makes an official report, public notice, or entry in any of the records or books of the corporation, concerning the corporation or its business, which is false in any material representation, shall be liable for all the damages resulting therefrom to any person injured thereby, and if two or more officers unite or participate in the commission of any of the acts herein designated, they shall be jointly and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Loaiza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Bank of Woodland v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Cruess v. FesslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kahn v. LischnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Willson v. Municipal Bond Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Fallis v. Julian Petroleum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Gleason v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Bedell Engineering Co. v. RouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.