Legal Opinion

Bullard v. Citizens' Nat. Bank

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1935No. 31626; 31626PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the fall of 1929, appellant, a widow of little or no business experience, had on deposit in bank eight thousand dollars, the proceeds of insurance, which she desired to invest in six per cent. bonds. She enlisted the assistance of her family physician who, in turn, got in touch with the officer of appellee bank in charge of its bond department. The physician disclosed to the bank officer that neither he nor appellant had any knowledge or experience in bonds or in the purchase thereof, and that they would have to depend upon the banker and in the trust that he would offer and sell to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nash Mississippi Valley Motor Co. v. ChildressMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Doggett v. EmersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1845
  3. J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Louis Cohn & Bros.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Alexander v. MeekMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Ganong v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Berkline Corp. v. Bank of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. White v. Hancock BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Stribling Bros. MacHinery Co. v. Girod Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Rhyne v. GammilMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  5. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. CooperMississippi Supreme Court · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API