Legal Opinion

Pacesetter Homes, Inc. v. Brodkin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1970No. Civ. 34807PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

Appellant, purchaser of two duplex buildings from respondent, appeals from an adverse judgment rendered on appellant’s cross-complaint alleging fraud inducing the sale. We affirm the judgment.

Nature of the Case

Respondent originally sued appellant in the municipal court for rents collected by appellant after respondent had reacquired the property involved in the lawsuit by foreclosure. Appellant filed an answer and counterclaim and also a cross-complaint claiming general and punitive damages for allegedly fraudulent conduct of respondent inducing him to buy the property. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Union FM v. Southern Cal. FMCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Willson v. Municipal Bond Co.California Supreme Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Cooper v. JevneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Schonfeld v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Sumitomo Bank v. Taurus Developers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API