Pacesetter Homes, Inc. v. Brodkin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
Appellant, purchaser of two duplex buildings from respondent, appeals from an adverse judgment rendered on appellant’s cross-complaint alleging fraud inducing the sale. We affirm the judgment.
Nature of the Case
Respondent originally sued appellant in the municipal court for rents collected by appellant after respondent had reacquired the property involved in the lawsuit by foreclosure. Appellant filed an answer and counterclaim and also a cross-complaint claiming general and punitive damages for allegedly fraudulent conduct of respondent inducing him to buy the property. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Union FM v. Southern Cal. FMCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Willson v. Municipal Bond Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Cooper v. JevneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Schonfeld v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Sumitomo Bank v. Taurus Developers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.