Legal Opinion

Gleason v. Proud

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1916No. Civ. No. 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Harold A. Gilman, Tanner, Taft & Odell, and Tanner, Odell, Odell & Taft, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

This is an action to enforce an alleged right of rescission of a contract and exchange of property between plaintiffs and defendant. The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The alleged misrepresentations relate to bonds of the Bisbee Light & Power Company, an Arizona corporation, which were transferred by defendant to plaintiff I. W. Gleason as the principal part of the consideration given by Proud for the property conveyed to him by Gleason. The transaction took place in September and October, 1908. Respondent Proud had acquired these…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gleason v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API