Legal Opinion

Willson v. Municipal Bond Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1936No. L. A. 15338PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TTIB COURT.

Defendants Municipal Bond Company, H. H. Cotton and M. D. Fox separately appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, rendered in an action brought by plaintiff against them and others, and predicated upon the alleged fraud of defendants. Although numerous briefs have been filed by counsel representing the parties to this controversy, and although many points are exhaustively discussed therein, basically the appeals present nothing more than a question of fact, viz., Is the implied finding of the jury that appellants are guilty of fraud practiced upon respondent supported by the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Sullivan v. HelbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Herdan v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. County of San Diego v. ChildsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Crandall v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API