Lee v. McClelland
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Walter Van Dyke, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Action on promissory note indorsed to plaintiff before maturity. The defense was that the note was given to plain tifPs indorser, one TJnruh, as evidence of a deferred payment under an executory contract for the sale of certain land and water stock; that said contract and the note were procured through the fraudulent representations of TJnruh as to the character of the land, and that plaintiff took the note with constructive notice of the fraud. Defendant had judgment, and plaintiff appeals therefrom and from an order denying him a new trial, his principal contention being that the evidence…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nounnan v. Sutter County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Rendell v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Blen v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by28 opinions
- Black & Decker Mfg. Co. v. Baltimore Truck Tire Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Schonfeld v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Stuck v. Delta Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
- Rheingans v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.