Legal Opinion

Letterlough v. Atkins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1962No. 521PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The Industrial Commission is not a court of general jurisdiction. It is an administrative board with quasi-judicial functions and has a special or limited jurisdiction created by statute and confined to its terms. Its jurisdiction may not be enlarged or extended by act or consent of parties, nor may jurisdiction be conferred by agreement or waiver. Hart v. Motors, 244 N.C. 84, 92 S.E. 2d 673; Reaves v. Mill Co., 216 N.C. 462, 5 S.E. 2d 305. To sustain the jurisdiction of the Commission it must affirmatively appear that the employer, which it undertakes to bind by its award, had as many as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Biddix v. Rex Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Reaves v. . Mill Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Chadwick v. North Carolina Department of Conservation & DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Reaves v. Earle-Chesterfield Mill Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Morse v. CurtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Clark v. GASTONIA ICE CREAM COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API