Legal Opinion

Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 9, 1956No. 383PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff has challenged the jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Industrial Commission in making an award to him based upon prior agreements between him and the defendants, on the ground that he is not subject to the provisions of the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act, for the reason that at the time of his injury he was not an employee of Thomasville Motors, Inc.,' but was an independent contractor.

The defendants contend that the Industrial Commission had no power or authority to hear and determine this challenge, because, one, there was no showing of a change of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Uphoff v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Corbett v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. In re T.R.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Youngblood v. North State Ford Truck SalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Richards v. Nationwide HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API