Legal Opinion

Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1985No. 8510IC51PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Although the parties do not raise the issue, we first consider whether this appeal is properly before us. In re Watson, 70 N.C. App. 120, 318 S.E. 2d 544 (1984), disc. rev. denied, 313 N.C. 330, 327 S.E. 2d 900 (1985). The effect of the full Commission’s order is not to dispose of the merits of the claim but merely to allow the proceeding to be heard. Accordingly, the order is interlocutory. See Poret v. State Personnel Comm., 74 N.C. App. 536, 328 S.E. 2d 880, disc. rev. denied, 314 N.C. 117, 332 S.E. 2d 491 (1985). Nevertheless, in our discretion we consider the merits.

I

The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Watkins v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Ross Realty Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Biddix v. Rex Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Gore v. Myrtle/MuellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Craver v. Dixie Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Craver v. Dixie Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API