Legal Opinion

Chadwick v. North Carolina Department of Conservation & Development

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for an award to the next of kin of deceased, Chadwick, because of his injury and death by accident while allegedly employed by defendants.

The appealing defendant, West Virginia Pulp & Paper Company, entered into a contract with the State Department of Conservation and Development under which the Pulp Company contributed one-half the expense (with a maximum limitation based on acreage), the Department one-fourth, and the Federal Government one-fourth — to be placed in a fund handled by the Department — to employ a “forest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reaves v. . Mill Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Pine v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Dependents of Fred Poole v. SigmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Hardman v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Durham v. McLambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Letterlough v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Hayes's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Hunter v. . PeirsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API