Legal Opinion
Clark v. GASTONIA ICE CREAM COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 31, 1964No. 180PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Plaintiff (an appellee) contends he sustained a compen-sable injury on May 3, 1960, for which he is entitled to a compensation award against Ice Cream Company. Plaintiff did not and does not assert any claim against Casualty Company.
Ice Cream Company (the appellant) contends: (1) Plaintiff did not sustain a compensable injury on May 3, 1960. (2) If he did, Casualty Company under its Policy No. OCL 614 140 is obligated to pay the compensation award.
Casualty Company (an appellee) contends its policy does not cover compensable injuries sustained prior to May 9, 1960, and that the Industrial…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Greene v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Goodson v. P. H. Glatfelter Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Poythress v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Pearson v. C.P. Buckner Steel Erection Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Palmer v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Davenport v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.