Castro v. Viera
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
This appeal concerns the Connecticut Workers’ Compensation Act. General Statutes § 31-275 et seq. The plaintiffs are Marie Castro and her minor children. The defendants are Joaquim and Mary Viera. The workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) for the first district dismissed the plaintiffs’ claim for benefits after he denied the plaintiffs’ motion to preclude1 the defendants from *422“contesting liability” because the defendants failed to file a “Notice of Intent to Contest Liability” pursuant to General Statutes § 31-297 (b) 2 within twenty days after receiving notice of their claim for…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- United States Trust Co. v. BohartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Perille v. Raybestos-Manhattan-Europe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by224 opinions
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
219 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.