Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Although defendants bring forth two issues, they are subsumed into one issue on appeal: whether the Industrial Commission erred in concluding: (a) that defendants are equitably estopped from pleading the two year time limit for filing under G.S. § 97-24(a) as a bar to jurisdiction, and (b) that plaintiff detrimentally relied as a matter of law on statements of defendant’s agent.
The jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission is limited by statute. Letterlough v. Atkins, 258 N.C. 166, 128 S.E.2d 215 (1962). “The right to compensation under [the Workers’ Compensation Act] shall be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- McCrater v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Letterlough v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Hamilton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- White v. Consolidated Planning, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Friedland v. GalesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Stratton v. Royal Bank of CanadaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Kanipe v. Lane UpholsteryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Lockerman v. S. River Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.