Legal Opinion

Morse v. Curtis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 11, 1970No. 7PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The question here presented for decision is: Did the Court of Appeals err in affirming the trial judge’s action in overruling defendant’s pleas in bar and allowing plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s entire First Further Answer and Defense?

Defendant first contends that when plaintiff Patricia Morse filed her claim with the Industrial Commission and the defendant thereafter admitted liability, the North Carolina Industrial Commission was invested with exclusive jurisdiction. In support of this position defendant cites and relies upon G.S. 97-9 and G.S. 97-10.1. We quote both sections:

“§…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Thomason v. Red Bird Cab Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lemmerman v. A. T. Williams Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Youngblood v. North State Ford Truck SalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Fungaroli v. FungaroliCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Cross v. Capital Transaction Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API