Reaves v. Earle-Chesterfield Mill Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
In support of their appeal, the defendants challenge the-jurisdiction of the North Carolina Industrial Commission in the premises on the ground that at the time of his injury plaintiff was not a resident of this State. With regard to its agreement it points out that since the Industrial Commission at no time had jurisdiction of the-subject matter, the defendant did not waive its objection to the jurisdiction by that agreement or its subsequent payments, in accordance therewith, and neither conferred a jurisdiction upon the Industrial Commission which it did not have by virtue of the statute.
*465Th…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lang v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Riggan v. . HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- In Re the Accounting of WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tedars v. Savannah River Veneer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Letterlough v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Aylor v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Warren v. Dixon and Christopher CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- McCreery v. Covenant Presbyterian ChurchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.