Legal Opinion

Reaves v. Earle-Chesterfield Mill Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 8, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

In support of their appeal, the defendants challenge the-jurisdiction of the North Carolina Industrial Commission in the premises on the ground that at the time of his injury plaintiff was not a resident of this State. With regard to its agreement it points out that since the Industrial Commission at no time had jurisdiction of the-subject matter, the defendant did not waive its objection to the jurisdiction by that agreement or its subsequent payments, in accordance therewith, and neither conferred a jurisdiction upon the Industrial Commission which it did not have by virtue of the statute.

*465Th…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Broderick v. RosnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lang v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Riggan v. . HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. In Re the Accounting of WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tedars v. Savannah River Veneer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  2. Letterlough v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Aylor v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Warren v. Dixon and Christopher CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. McCreery v. Covenant Presbyterian ChurchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API