Legal Opinion
Gold v. TOWN OF EAST HADDAM
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 24, 2009No. SC 18067PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Leo Gold, Joan S. Levy and the executors of the estate of Bernard Manger, Harold Bernstein and Joseph Lieberman, brought this action seeking a permanent injunction barring the defendant, the town of East Haddam, from condemning their property. Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that the taking was barred because the defendant had not condemned their property within six months of the referendum vote authorizing the condemnation as required by General Statutes § 48-6 (a).1 The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment claiming that the six month time…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Farrell v. FarrellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. CanalesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crawford v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Weiss v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- In Re Judicial Inquiry Number 2005-02Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Billboards Divinity, LLC v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- DeCORSO v. CALDERAROConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.