Legal Opinion
DeCORSO v. CALDERARO
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 29, 2009No. AC 30353PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The pro se plaintiff, Gail DeCorso, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered when it granted the motions for summary judgment filed by the defendants Alfred J. Zullo, an attorney, and Neil Longobardi, a state marshal. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred when it granted the motions for summary judgment because it failed to consider (1) Practice Book § 61-11 (a), (2) 11 U.S.C. § 362 (a) (2), and (3) (a) issues of material fact as to the rules of practice and the United States Bankruptcy Code and (b) the allegations of trespass in the original…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Forbes v. BallaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Plouffe v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Lone Star Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- DePietro v. Department of Public SafetyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Blumberg Associates Worldwide, Inc. v. Brown & Brown of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Lavette v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- DePietro v. Department of Public SafetyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Decorso v. CalderaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.