Legal Opinion
Mahoney v. Lensink
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 30, 1990No. 13605PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
This appeal concerns the availability and the scope of the remedy afforded by General Statutes § 17-206k to a voluntary patient in a state mental hospital who claims a deprivation of personal, property and civil rights under General Statutes § 17-206b and a violation of his right to humane and dignified treatment under General Statutes § 17-206C.1 The plaintiffs, Richard E. Mahoney, individually'and in his capacity as administrator of his son’s estate,2 and Barbara *551Mahoney, individually, brought an action against the commissioners of mental health, state police and mental retardation* *3 upon…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Davidson v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- In re Activision Blizzard, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Ferreira v. PringleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.