Legal Opinion
Farrell v. Farrell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 5, 1980PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
The issue dispositive of this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the defendant’s counter-affidavit failed to present any triable issue of fact.
The plaintiff’s complaint, which sought to foreclose a judgment lien, alleged that on April 27, 1973, the plaintiff obtained a judgment against the defendant in the sum of $25,000, and to secure said sum, she caused to be filed a judgment lien against the defendant’s real estate situated in Darien. The defendant filed an answer denying the allegations of the complaint and,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Plouffe v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Dorazio v. M. B. Foster Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Dougherty v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Bartha v. Waterbury House Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. GogginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.