Legal Opinion
State v. Curcio
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 9, 1983No. 11535PublishedCited by 369 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpeziale, C. J.
The defendant has appealed from the trial court’s denial of his motion to quash an order for a second grand jury. Because we find that the denial is not a final judgment, the appeal is dismissed.
On February 4, 1982, the Superior Court for the judicial district of Fairfield, upon application by the state’s attorney’s office for that district, called and impaneled a grand jury pursuant to § 54-45 2 of the General Statutes. The state’s attorney then presented a proposed true bill to the grand jury alleging that on September 19,1981, in Bridgeport, the defendant, Gus Curcio, intentionally aided…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by369 opinions
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
364 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.