Legal Opinion
In Re Judicial Inquiry Number 2005-02
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 25, 2009No. SC 18069PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The issue ultimately dispositive of this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court correctly construed General Statutes §§ 54-47b through 54- 47g (grand jury statutes). The intervening three judge panel (panel) appealed from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which concluded that the panel is required to hold a hearing to determine whether the petitioner, Robert Lawlor, is entitled to disclosure of the state’s application for, and the panel’s order authorizing, a grand jury investigation pursuant to the grand jury statutes. The panel asserts that General Statutes §…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Thomas v. Department of Developmental ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- In Re Matthew F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- In re Santiago G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Barlow v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.