Legal Opinion

State v. Canales

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 13, 2007No. SC 17102PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

The defendant, Flora Canales, directly appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a. 2 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the admission into evidence at trial of statements that she had made to police officers violated her constitutional right against self-incrimination because they were the product of an illegal arrest, or a custodial interrogation in violation of her Miranda rights, 3 and (2) her due process rights under the state and federal constitutions and her state constitutional…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  3. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. State v. MullinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. In Re Melody L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API