State v. Canales
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The defendant, Flora Canales, directly appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a. 2 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the admission into evidence at trial of statements that she had made to police officers violated her constitutional right against self-incrimination because they were the product of an illegal arrest, or a custodial interrogation in violation of her Miranda rights, 3 and (2) her due process rights under the state and federal constitutions and her state constitutional…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. MullinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- In Re Melody L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.