Legal Opinion
In Re Steinberg
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 2005No. 05-BG-413PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding against respondent, Andrew M. Steinberg, Esquire, a member of our Bar, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has found that respondent violated D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1(a) (failure to provide competent representation), 1.1(b) (failure to represent his client with the skill and care of similarly situated practitioners), 1.2(a) (failure to adhere to the objectives of his client), 1.3(a) (failure to represent client with diligence and zeal), 1.3(c) (failure to represent client with reasonable promptness), and 1.4(a) (failure to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re MintzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re OntellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re ChapmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re SteinbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- In re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re CoopetDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006