Legal Opinion
In Re Ontell
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 18, 1999No. 98-BG-873PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent comes before this court for a second time upon charges that he has neglected legal matters on behalf of clients. See In re Ontell, 593 A.2d 1038 (D.C.1991). In the instant case, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”), in accord with the Hearing Committee (“Committee”), concluded that the respondent, David J. Ontell, violated Rules 1.1(a) and (b); 1.3(a), (b) and (c); 1.4(a); 1.16(a) and (d); and 8.4(d) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct by neglecting the legal matters of his clients. Accordingly, the Board recommends that this court impose a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re OntellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- In Re MintzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re AskewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re ColeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re BettisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.