Legal Opinion

In Re Coopet

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2006No. 06-BG-186PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The respondent, Michael W. Coopet, has been a member of the Bar of this court since October 2, 1985, although he has been administratively suspended for the non-payment of dues since September 30, 2002. Respondent is also a member of the Bars of the states of California and Minnesota but was suspended by the California Supreme Court on September 9, 2005 for certain ethical violations with respect to his representation of a client. Specifically, Respondent conceded that his conduct violated California Rules of Professional Conduct 3-110(A) (failure to provide competent representation); 3 —…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re CoopetDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API