Legal Opinion
In Re Mintz
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 24, 1993No. 92-SP-222PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent Mark A. Mintz is a member of the Bars of both New Jersey and the District of Columbia. Effective February 2, 1992, and until further court order, the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended respondent for two years for grossly neglecting his clients’ matters, exhibiting a pattern of neglect, lacking due diligence, failing to communicate with clients, failing to cooperate with ethics authorities, and failing to maintain a bona fide office in New Jersey, in violation of New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1(a), 1.1(b), 1.3, 1.4, 8.1(b), and New Jersey Rules of General…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Matter of AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Matter of SheehyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of MulkeenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re BradleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re OntellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In re Rodriguez-QuesadaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.