Legal Opinion
In Re Delaney
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 17, 1997No. 96-BG-974PublishedCited by 170 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Before us for disciplinary action is the case of an attorney whose behavior constituted an “egregious failure to cooperate” with Bar Counsel’s investigation of a disciplinary complaint. Neither Respondent nor Bar Counsel has filed exceptions to the recommendation of a majority of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) that Respondent be suspended for thirty days, and that as conditions of reinstatement, he be required to show that he has responded to the inquiries of Bar Counsel and the order of the Board and to show fitness under D.C. Bar R. XI, §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re LockieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re SiegelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re PearsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- In Re FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re GodetteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.