Legal Opinion
In Re Steinberg
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 1998No. 97-BG-1514PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIA1VI:
The Virginia State Bar’s Fifth District Subcommittee found that respondent had violated a number of the Disciplinary Rules of the Virginia Bar in connection with his retention by a client in a divorce matter. On May 23, 1997, the subcommittee publicly reprimanded respondent with terms, including a $5,000 refund to the client and an additional $1,000 for attorneys’ fees incurred. The Office of Bar Counsel for the District of Columbia forwarded a certified copy of the order of public reprimand to this court. We, in turn, entered an order referring the matter to the Board on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re PeekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re BernsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re GreenspanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.