Legal Opinion
In re Steinberg
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 17, 2008No. 06-BG-1393PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
This reciprocal disciplinary matter stems from the disbarment of respondent, Andrew M. Steinberg, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland on November 6, 2006. That court found that respondent committed serious and protracted acts of neglect and was dishonest with clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals, in violation of a number of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, during his representation of two clients in separate probate and bankruptcy matters.1
Respondent failed to notify Bar Counsel of his disbarment in Maryland as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(b). Upon discovering it, Bar…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- In Re FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re PowellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re BleeckerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re David H. LoomisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014