In Re Steinberg
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In its attached Report and Recommendation, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that Andrew M. Steinberg, a member of our Bar, be suspended from practice for thirty days for conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice. The facts on which the recommendation was based are more fully described in the Board’s Report. In essence, Steinberg was extremely dilatory in responding to Bar Counsel’s requests for information on two separate but chronologically overlapping matters and failed to cooperate with the investigations. Steinberg had also previously…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re LockieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- In re HowesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re GodetteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.