Legal Opinion

In Re Steinberg

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 2000No. 99-BG-1537PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

In its attached Report and Recommendation, the Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that Andrew M. Steinberg, a member of our Bar, be suspended from practice for thirty days for conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice. The facts on which the recommendation was based are more fully described in the Board’s Report. In essence, Steinberg was extremely dilatory in responding to Bar Counsel’s requests for information on two separate but chronologically overlapping matters and failed to cooperate with the investigations. Steinberg had also previously…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In Re LockieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. In re HowesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. In Re ArtisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. In Re GodetteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API