In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Tonkon
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
By a disciplinary complaint heard before a trial board and reviewed by the Disciplinary Review Board, the Oregon State Bar brings before the court the issue whether an attorney violates the Code of Professional Responsibility whenever he prepares a will that contains a bequest for himself without advising the testator to obtain independent legal advice. We hold that this action in itself does not constitute a violation and that the accused committed no violation in this case.
The Oregon State Bar’s complaint alleged two causes of complaint, both arising out of the accused’s representation of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BartlettOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re the Conduct of MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re Millen F. KneelandOregon Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GriffithOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KinseyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.