Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Jones

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The accused is charged with unethical conduct for preparing a will which left the entire estate of the testatrix of the will to the accused without advising his client to seek independent advice. Mr. Jones does not deny his participation in the preparation and execution of the will. He states that he committed a “technical” violation without any avaricious intent. He attributes his failure to temporary distraction caused by too much work and to error in judgment.

Any lawyer should know, without being told, that when a client wants to make a testamentary provision for the benefit of the lawyer,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Conduct of MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In Re Millen F. KneelandOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. AmundsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of TonkonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Randall. v. ReynoldsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PrueterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Randall v. ReynoldsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API