In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Bartlett
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is a disciplinary proceeding in which it is clear that the accused has violated the ethics of the profession. The Trial Board recommended suspension for one year. The Disciplinary Review Board recommended suspension for "not less than” six months. The accused contends that his misconduct merits no more than a public reprimand and a one-year probation period with a special condition that he take and pass a course in Legal Ethics "at Northwestern College of Law, Lewis and Clark College, in Portland, Oregon.” Alternatively, the accused suggests that if any suspension is imposed it be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Complaint of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Toomey v. MOORE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Scarth v. ScarthOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pollock v. MarshallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.