Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Montgomery

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1982No. OSB 80-53, SC 28251PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney discipline case involving a loan from the client to the lawyer. We find that the accused lawyer, Kenneth M. Montgomery, violated DR 5-104(A), and we impose a public reprimand.

Montgomery practices law in Portland. MacLellan and Farnham were two of the three principal owners of a corporation, BLT Enterprises, Inc. Montgomery represented BLT on an ongoing basis. He also represented MacLellan and Farnham on some personal matters and was personally involved in other business ventures with MacLellan. The third principal in BLT was a man named Thompson, who was inactive in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BartlettOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of TonkonOregon Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. BosworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WeidnerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Matter of SpearArizona Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API