Legal Opinion

Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1980No. CA 9772, SC 26120PublishedCited by 140 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*295LINDE, J.

Petitioner, a dentist licensed both in Oregon and in California and maintaining offices in both states, seeks review of an order of the State Board of Dental Examiners which revoked his Oregon license on the ground of "unprofessional conduct.” ORS 679.140(l)(c) and (5)(d).

The conduct which the board found unprofessional under the statute was that petitioner obtained malpractice insurance coverage for other dentists employed by him in his California practice by a misrepresentation that they were employed in Oregon. Briefly stated, the board found that petitioner had requested this…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by140 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API