Legal Opinion

In Re the Conduct of Moore

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes before us in regular course to review the findings and recommendations of the Board of Governors of the Oregon Bar respecting charges of professional misconduct made against Floyd D. Moore, an attorney licensed to practice in the courts of this state.

On February 5, 1959, the Oregon Bar filed a complaint containing four charges, as follows:

The First alleges that on or about October 19, 1953, while the accused was acting as attorney at law and counselor for his client Huida Hollander, she executed a last will and testament, prepared by the accused, in which she left to him all…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Lobb's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Toomey v. MOORE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. First Christian Church v. McReynoldsOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. Gralewski's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. In Re Lobb's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of TonkonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Randall. v. ReynoldsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Randall v. ReynoldsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API