Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Moore

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1985No. SC S30904; OSB 82-63PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against David L. Moore accusing him of unethical conduct in five separate causes. All the causes arise, directly or indirectly, from Moore’s alleged representation of clients in connection with the negotiation and purchase of the corporate stock of Pinnacle Packing Corporation, Inc.

The Bar’s complaint is dated January 11, 1983, and Moore accepted service of it on January 31, 1983. The Trial Board found Moore guilty of all causes and recommended that he be disbarred. The four member Disciplinary Review Board found that the Trial Board’s opinion was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CarstensOregon Supreme Court · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of WittemyerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GriffithOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HostetterOregon Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API