Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Centeno

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided November 25, 1983No. NMCM 83 2931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARR, Judge:

Appellant, upon his pleas of guilty, was convicted by special court-martial tried by military judge alone on 20 January 1983, of an unauthorized absence from USS OKINAWA extending from 31 July 1978 to 29 November 1982, in violation of Article 86, 10 U.S.C.A. § 886, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The only record evidence which describes official action taken subsequent to the commencement of the absence and up to the referral stage is the *644Charge Sheet (DD Form 458). Page 1 of that document reveals that on 9 July 1980, Naval Military Personnel Command, Washington, D.C.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MasusockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  2. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  3. United States v. DouglasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  5. United States v. LemarbeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. HiltonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. HoltU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. MooreU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. YatesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  5. United States v. WesleyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API