Legal Opinion

United States v. Hilton

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 24, 1990No. ACM S27401 (f rev)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW

BLOMMERS, Senior Judge:

This case has again been remanded to us by the United States Court of Military Appeals for consideration of the constitutionality of provisions in a general regulation that require members of the U.S. forces in the Republic of the Philippines (hereinafter referred to as RP) to show possession or authorized disposition of tax-exempt property when directed to do so by cognizant authorities.1 Before addressing the constitutional issues, a matter which arose following remand should first be resolved.

I

Upon further review, a concern arose as to…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. LumaguiU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. SmallsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. KretchmerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API