United States v. Hilton
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW
BLOMMERS, Senior Judge:
This case has again been remanded to us by the United States Court of Military Appeals for consideration of the constitutionality of provisions in a general regulation that require members of the U.S. forces in the Republic of the Philippines (hereinafter referred to as RP) to show possession or authorized disposition of tax-exempt property when directed to do so by cognizant authorities.1 Before addressing the constitutional issues, a matter which arose following remand should first be resolved.
I
Upon further review, a concern arose as to…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. HiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. LumaguiU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. SmallsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. KretchmerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991