United States v. Lemarbe
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
BAUM, Senior Judge:
In her first assignment of error, appellant correctly notes that the court-martial order recites that she pleaded guilty to the Charge when she, in fact, pleaded not guilty. We therefore direct that a supplementary court-martial order be issued correcting this error.
Appellant’s second assignment of error asserts that no evidence presented at trial establishes that the Charge was preferred and received within the time provided by the statute of limitations by an officer exercising summary court-martial jurisdiction over appellant, as required by Article 43(c), Uniform Code…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. MasusockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
- United States v. BarbeauU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. CentenoU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. HiltonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. RiceU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. TuckerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984