Legal Opinion
Moore v. Vandermast, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1941No. L. A. 17265PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, C. J. —
This action was brought to reform a written lease and to recover damages for a breach of the reformed lease. The plaintiff appeals from that portion of the judgment which denied his right to have the lease reformed and denied the recovery requested under the reformed provisions of the lease. No appeal was taken from that portion of the judgment granting plaintiff recovery for the defendant’s breach of the lease as written.
The plaintiff, Walter L. Moore, is the owner of a four-story structure known as the “Moore Building” in the city of Santa Ana. The defendant corporation and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hochstein v. BerghauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Burt v. Los Angeles Olive Growers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Sullivan v. MoorheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Siem v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mills v. SchulbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Pluth v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- California Pacific Title Co. v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Alvarez v. RitterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Gardner v. Mobil Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.