Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Mobil Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1963No. Civ. 20692PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.

Plaintiffs (lessors) appeal from an adverse judgment in an action to reform a written lease agreement and to recover damages from defendant (lessee) for the breach of such agreement, as reformed. The record is confined to the clerk’s transcript.

The sole issue on appeal is whether there were irregularities in the proceedings of the trial court by which plaintiffs were prevented from having a fair trial. (Code Civ. Proc., § 657, subd. 1.)

The specific irregularity claimed is that the trial judge not only formed an opinion as to the merits of the case before plaintiffs had completed the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weil v. WeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Rosenfield v. VosperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Burt v. Los Angeles Olive Growers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Ryan v. WelteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Moore v. Vandermast, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pac. & Sw. Annual Conference of United Methodist Church v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Lowe v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Armco Inc. v. Glenfed Financial Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  5. Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API