Legal Opinion

Burt v. Los Angeles Olive Growers Assn.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1917No. Sac. No. 2335PublishedCited by 27 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant to recover the price of olives purchased by defendant from plaintiff under a written contract. The agreement was made on the seventh day of July, 1913, and was between the parties to this action. It provided “that the party of the second part [defendant] does by these presents purchase all the crop of olives for the year 1913 growing on the trees situate on the following described real property: . . .

“That said party of the first part agrees to accept and the said party of the second part agrees to pay to the party of the first part for all the Mission & Mansanillo…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Lestrade v. BarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Hochstein v. BerghauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Robins v. HopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. L.A. & Redondo R.R. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Gajanich v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Dale v. DaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Radin v. Jewish National FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API