California Pacific Title Co. v. Moore
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MOOR, J. pro tem. *
Defendant Teresa H. Moore appeals from a judgment reforming a deed.
(For the purpose of clarity the land involved will be described as parcel 1—a large piece of land composed of parcels 2 and 3.)
In February 1961 defendant purchased some land from the Sutton Pumphrey Company. The deed, drawn by plaintiff title company, described parcel 1. A month later defendant received a letter informing her that an error had been made and that the deed should have described only parcel 2. Defendant had recorded her deed. ' When she refused to agree to a reformation, plaintiff brought this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Anglo California National Bank v. KiddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Mills v. SchulbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Pluth v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- SCO Group, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Jensen v. Quality Loan Service Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- McCown v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Western Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Heflin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.