Legal Opinion

California Pacific Title Co. v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 1964No. Civ. 10826PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOOR, J. pro tem. *

Defendant Teresa H. Moore appeals from a judgment reforming a deed.

(For the purpose of clarity the land involved will be described as parcel 1—a large piece of land composed of parcels 2 and 3.)

In February 1961 defendant purchased some land from the Sutton Pumphrey Company. The deed, drawn by plaintiff title company, described parcel 1. A month later defendant received a letter informing her that an error had been made and that the deed should have described only parcel 2. Defendant had recorded her deed. ' When she refused to agree to a reformation, plaintiff brought this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Anglo California National Bank v. KiddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Mills v. SchulbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Pluth v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. SCO Group, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Jensen v. Quality Loan Service Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
  3. McCown v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Western Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Heflin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API